3 Responses to “Breaking Down Lunardi’s Early Bracketology”

  1. KDuffy15No Gravatar says:

    I agree with his 1 seeds, those seem to be the consensus top 4 teams in the counry especially considering the way Georgetown has struggled despite what their 7-0 record indicates.

    I’m not sure Texas will compete for one of those seeds simply because they are going to lose a number of games in the Big 12. Kansas and A+M are going to give the Longhorns two serious games, and teams like K-State, Baylor, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Mizzou are no pushovers either.

    One team I am sold on as a potential No. 1 (if any of the top four goes through a rough patch during the year) and a definite No. 2 is Duke. The Blue Devils can spread the floor like no other team and will have a chance to win any game just on three-point shooting alone. With that being said, we all know the saying–You live by the three, you die by the three. So far Duke hasn’t come close to dying and because of their depth (and Un-Duke-like athleticism) I dont see them losing more than 5 games all year.

  2. Thunderbolt210No Gravatar says:

    It’s really interesting to see a bracket this early, but some things i don’t agee with and of course its way too early but i honestly feel Texas will get one of the number 1 seeds and i think Pitt and Clemson will be ranked 4 or higher. especially Clemson as there playing really well and it seems as if everyone is overlooking Texas A.J. Abrams and D.J Augustin make one hell of a back court and everyone says gaurd play is key…well name me two better gaurds.

    yesssirrr

  3. NorlanderNo Gravatar says:

    Hard to argue w/ Texas’ two guards, and I do believe in the guard play philosophy.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.